Neaera the Great: An Explication of One Woman’s Movement to Power :: Creative Writing Essays

Preface Though we are discussing ancient times, this paper is not traditional academic work. The subject (and I mean that in more ways than one) of my focus is a woman named Neaera who is placed on trial for proclaiming herself and her children as citizens of Athens, even though she is widely viewed as a woman of the street of foreign birth. My central contention throughout this discussion is that she is a woman of extraordinary courage and to an incredible degree, takes control over her circumstances and makes powerful choices. In tune with this description, I choose to write in a style that accurately reflects the reverence that I hold for Neaera. Rather than an analytical exchange of observation, I intentionally take the tone of someone who is much like a boxing promoter. I place myself firmly in Neaeras corner and or else of articulating her greatness through the shadowy form of a third person who remains academically objective and unattached, I take a direct f oot for her as a praiseworthy historical figure. To this end, I write from the first person with the motive to reveal and uplift Neaeras impressiveness and I engage a general manner of speech atypical to academic language. Additionally, I use of myriad of persuasive methods that are relatively uncommon and I do so because, fundamentally, Neaera is an uncommon and atypical character. In light of this revelation, the least that I can do is to make sure that my form and content align as a means of writing a paper that is outside of the norm in order to honor a woman who consistently chose her own way. In other (more effective) words, Neaera rocks and Im willing to rock out in order to make sure that she gets the props that she deserves. Neaera the Great An Explication of One Womans Movement to Power Consider the possibility that how we listen to people creates the way life will be for them as well as for ourselves. Is this a basis statement? Perhaps. Many of us ho ld fast to the idea that we are the controllers of our own fate (myself included) and that, for instance, even if someone listened to us as if we were never sack to amount to anything that would ever resemble success, we would eventually triumph in the end (especially against the odds stacked against us by would be detractors).

Commentary on the Satiric Nature of George Orwell’s 1984 Essay

It goes without saying that every mildew in literature is unique. The way that certain novels, novellas, or poems go about accentuating certain themes or points, whether of grand temperament or of little consequence to society, is certainly achieved through a concoction of literary styles. The most enduring and effective works of literature exhibit an misrepresented combination of literary device and aforementioned technique. Without a doubt, George Orwells cardinal eighty-four exhibits such a blend of style through characteristics of a dystopian novel and satire. Orwell lived in a time when the spread of communism, mostly unbeknownst to his audience, posed an unimaginable threat to freedom. Therefore, though his novel, he attempted to emphasize the fallacies that would dwell in a totalitarian nation-state if people were to accept its lure of equality. However, many argue about how exactly Orwell goes about achieving this the line of argument divided among satire and a dystopi an fiction. Yet, its impossible to be dogmatic when considering this aspect of literature since, as stated above, any piece of literature, most peculiarly works such as cardinal Eighty-Four, exhibit a mix of literary elements. Upon close inspection though, it becomes possible to understand Orwells Nineteen Eighty-Four as a novel with strong satiric elements. By analyzing the presence of novelistic rudiments, such as dystopian plot, characterization, theme, and symbolism, compared to satiric essentials of humor, irony, and subtle criticism, it becomes evident that the effectiveness of Nineteen Eighty-Four derives from the fact that it adheres strongly as a novel with strong satiric elements compared to satire with novelistic elements.Its important to emphasis tha... ...symbolism employs, it becomes possible to understand Nineteen Eighty-Four as a novel with strong satiric elements. There are different degrees of satire, and this particular work of Orwell the satire, perhaps compar ed to more blatant criticisms of political theories such as his Animal Farm, is much more subtle. The criticism is less obvious compared to the more foreboding warning presented through the implementation of novelistic elements. Still, some may argue that the exaggerated nature of the work is itself satiric, but one cant necessarily draw a distinction between that and warning. Thus lies the cloudiness that makes works such as Nineteen Eighty-Four effective. Prevalent novelistic elements combined with subtle jabs of satire, in the form of dark humor, criticism, and irony make this particular work everlasting and truly applicable to any temporal period.

David Letterman :: Biography Biographies Bio

David LettermanDavid Letterman grew up in a small town in eastern Indiana. Hewas born to Joseph and Dorothy Letterman. After rendition the novel, DavidLetterman On Stage and Off by Rosemarie Lennon, I have learned about all hisstruggles and joys. Because of this book, I feel sorry towards one of thefunniest people on Earth, David Letterman. I also admire him for his good actsand abilities.To realize why I feel what I feel toward Letterman, you have to look atsome of the chief(prenominal) points in his life. First of all, Dave was exactly an Astudent. He struggled all of his life through grade school to college. He alsowasnt very popular. He stated, I remember standing around. . . with theother losers, watching all the athletes play sports. All we could do is makefun and ridicule them. He was neer good at anything until high school. AllI ever knew how to do was to make people laugh. In high school I was the classclown, making fun of everything and everyone. This pers onality trait was whatgave him his thousands of faithful fans, watching his show every night to seeDave rip to shreds anyone who dare challenge him. Another thing that wasimportant to him was his mother and father. His father, Joseph Letterman, andDave went seek quite often when he was young. Dave looked up to his fathertremendously. When Joseph had his first heart attack when he was thirty-six,Dave and his father started to drift away. Later, Daves Dad died when he wasfifty-three. One of Davids flush regrets was never spending a lot of time withhis dad. As for his mother, she is the classical conservative mother of thefifties. She was always very hard on Dave when he got into mischief in school--which was quite often. She is still a part of Daves life, and can be seenquite often on his show, doing a comedy sketch, or congress audience members whatthe temperature was in Lillihammer during the Winter Olympics.The Reason I feel sorry for Letterman is because of his tragedi es of hispast. His Dads passing was hard enough, but he had other trials to deal with.Like his mother. She was never really proud of David, constantly reminding himhe was going to fail, and not encouraging him to take his natural ability to